ded_maxim: (преведение)
[personal profile] ded_maxim
Фофудьеносцы в вооруженных силах США:
An army private from Fort Bragg contacted me when he was going through basic training. When he signed up, they asked him his religious denomination and he said Christian, but they identified him as not being fundamentalist enough Christian, and they punished him by putting 'none' on his dog tags. When he got to Afghanistan, the commander said that the blessings of the Lord Jesus would not be on the unit unless everyone were evangelical, and since he would not convert, this 20-year-old private would be responsible for the deaths and injuries the unit might suffer.

In another case, we caught a three-star general who ordered his staff to put together a PowerPoint presentation demonstrating the direct parallel between the Book of Revelation and all of our combat movements in Tikrit, Mosul, Fallujah, Sadr City and farther east in Afghanistan. We were able to stop it after it got to 2,500 troops.
Молиться, поститься и смотреть Fox News.
Молиться, поститься и смотреть Fox News.
Молиться, поститься и смотреть Fox News.
Молиться, поститься и смотреть Fox News.

Date: 2007-08-16 03:01 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Вам, однако, невдомёк, что превращение of the "Evangelicals" в как бы "государственную религию США" есть пункт в планах неоконсерваторов.

Сама необходимость ввести религию после убийства ненавистного либерализма, ( который основатель неоконской мысли, Лео Штраус сравнивал с Ваймаровской Германией и считал создающим ростки опасного для выживания евреев фашизма), все равно какую, есть одно из основных положений его взглядов, наряду с "благородной ложью", делением управляющих на "философов" которые выше морали и "джентльменов", которым не говорят всей правды, и которые полезны для управления массами, шифрованием учения и так далее.

В США основой для такой религии был выбран "евангелизм", как секция, признающая главенство евреев (в роли "старших братьев") и безусловную поддержку израильского проекта.

Кампания по пропаганде этого течения была одновременной с выпуском на экраны США "дискуссий дарвинистов с креационистами", вдруг откопанным ситкомом о христианском пасторе и его прихожанах и многочисленными связями политиков из администрации Буша с деятелями этих назначенных на главные роли "христиан".

Если знать this background, рассказанные вами истории совершенно неудивительны: где же как не в армии государство особенно топорно будет вводить идеологию для "младших братьев".

Только вы, не зная подоплеки, и высказываясь с традиционной позиции еврея, который борется с христианством (всегда, везде и в полную силу отпущенных ему возможностей), как бы сели в лужу.
Это - правильное, нужное, прописанное еврейством населению Америки "христианство". Это надлежит поддерживать.

Date: 2007-08-16 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ygam.livejournal.com
О, крокодильчик не подписывается.

Date: 2007-08-16 03:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
А зачем ему? Стиль его все равно распознается на раз.

Date: 2007-08-16 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
Я вот ненавижу евреев, очень обеспокоен засилием массонов, массоны ведут свою ужасную подрывную работу, негодяи!

Date: 2007-08-16 05:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-increp708.livejournal.com
А меня беспокоють масссоны! Они меня преследуют каждый раз по дороге на работу! Где я могу записаться в добровольцы бить масссонов?

Date: 2007-08-16 04:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] symbolith.livejournal.com
Что, товарищ лейтенант, бригада не дремлет?

Date: 2007-08-16 05:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] psizin.livejournal.com
По-моему, на войне может и не так крышу снести.

Date: 2007-08-18 03:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
I call BULLSHIT.

Date: 2007-08-19 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
OK. So what's your take on it?

Date: 2007-08-20 07:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
My take on it is this: I have never had my superiors, in training and in line units, even ask me first about my religion. When I would mention, in passing, that I am agnostic, nobody (with one exception, but he was equal to me in rank and had a slight mental issue with religion,) would ever attempt to evangelize me, including the chaplains. In general, political correctness (in the good sense) and professionalism are so ingrained in our officer corps that to bring up the book of revelations in any kind of official situation, like a briefing, is about as accepted and expected as casually throwing out a racial slur. The situations described above are practically unhinkable to me. It's possible that somebody would lose his mind and pull some such shit in theory, I guess, but the second it got to the Inspector General and/or Equal Opportunity chain, their career would be ruined. I mean, I've never so much as heard the word "fag" used by an officer in any kind of official or semi-official context. So to me, this is basically a bunch of douchebags taking advantage of you and people like you, and exploiting your ignorance in order to make the armed forces seem like a bunch of bible-thumping retards, which is pretty par for the course these days. Of course, given that most of the population has never served, they are completely lacking a frame of reference and take shit like this at face value, which means servicemembers and veterans have that many more people prejudiced against them.

Again, I've seen higher-ups do some fucked up shit in my 7 years in, heard of a lot more, but nothing like this.

Date: 2007-08-21 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
Now that's what I call a reasoned response! Your answer is no better than the flying crocodile's above, except that his view is that a bunch of neocon Jews are trying to turn the troops into obedient "Bible-thumping retards," while yours is that a bunch of liberal, latte-sipping, America-hating Jews (who else? the dude in the interview is named Michael Weinstein, after all, hmmm ...) are trying to "make the armed forces seem like a bunch of Bible-thumping retards." Did I say anywhere that I personally think that the armed forces are a bunch of Bible-thumping retards? I certainly do not think that, just as I don't think that the armed forces are a bunch of torture-loving, sadistic wackos. All this quote indicates to me isthat some higher-ups with fucked up religious ideas feel encouraged by the current administration to pull shit like this. Now, that doesn't sound that far-fetched to me, given the fact that the previous Attorney-General had ordered the tits of the Statue of Justice covered up and would open staff meetings with a prayer.

Date: 2007-08-21 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
Are you sure you're responging to my posting? Please, point out the exact place where I said anything about latte-sipping, America-hating Jews.

I have no idea what sounds far-fetched to you and what doesn't, but I can tell you this is obvious bullshit based on my 7 years of service. I'm not going to argue with you about the political and religious climate in the armed forces, primarily because you're not qualified in this matter.

Date: 2007-08-21 09:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
I wrote the thing about latte-sipping, America-hating Jews sarcastically. Seeing as how you've decided to read things into my post that weren't there (such as sweeping generalizations about the whole armed forces), I responded in kind.

Also, what looks like "obvious bullshit" to you may not look so to others who are "not qualified in this matter". So if you say so, I am inclined to trust you primarily because of your experience, even though you may have just been lucky (I mean, I hope nobody referred to you as a Christ killer (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/06/national/main919947.shtml)), even though it takes some effort not to question the objectivity of someone who insults his opponent's intelligence instead of arguing with, you know, facts.

Date: 2007-08-21 09:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
Let's set the record straight-I never read anything into your post that wasn't there. The sweeping generalization is basically implied by the source material-the only kind of atmosphere where this kind of unprofessional behavior could survive on such a high level is one of institutional Bible-thumping bigotry and intolerance. I missed your sarcasm, but do not take kindly to being compared to bigots and conspirologists like Emdrone.

I won't comment on Mikey Weinstein's suit, not having ever been in the USAFA and not being acquainted with anyone familiar with the facts of the case. I will say that while I've engaged in a good bit of shit-talking with peers, some of which was racial or religious in nature, it was all in good fun, and nobody took it seriously. I've never seen anything like what's described in the source, with superiors pushing their religion on subordinates.

Date: 2007-08-21 10:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
I'm talking of course about Weinstein's 2005 lawsuit against the USAFA, specifically.

In general, I suspect his motives-just a vibe the guy puts out.

Date: 2007-08-21 10:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
Do you question his motives or do you suspect him of twisting the facts? Those are different things after all.

Date: 2007-08-22 03:12 am (UTC)

Date: 2007-08-21 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
I missed your sarcasm, but do not take kindly to being compared to bigots and conspirologists like Emdrone.

I am sorry if I offended you. For my part, I do not take kindly to accusations of prejudice against the armed forces. There's no need to get into that whole "you don't support the troops" mode here, it's not Fox News.

Date: 2007-08-22 03:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
I leveled no such accusation at you. Indyweek, however, is a different story. I'm not offended by anything you've said at all, but there's a lot of stupidity and ignorance coming our way from the media, and it gets deeper the further left you look, all the way to Ted Rall. Unfortunately, instead of actually being independent, most "independent" newspapers like the Independent Weekly generally follow the same ideology, which this article is a prime exhibit of.

Since you mentioned it, Fox News is better, but not by far-it's the same yuppie douchebags, just with a different corporate ideology. They're still life-long representatives of the chattering classes.

Date: 2007-08-22 03:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ded-maxim.livejournal.com
Hey, here I agree with you almost 100%. Except for that "Fox News is better" thing -- they are neither better nor worse than anyone else. As far as Indyweek goes, it is quite annoying, what with their teary-eyed articles about the fate of a local Greenpeace commune etc. And don't even get me started on things like the Daily Kos.

Date: 2007-08-22 04:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boriskogan.livejournal.com
In my mind, douchebags propagandizing for me are better than douchebags propagandizing against me.

Free best online.

Date: 2008-04-23 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hi,good site!

Profile

ded_maxim: (Default)
ded_maxim

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425 2627282930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 14th, 2025 10:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios